How Latin America is Perceived in UN General Debates

Wendy Chavez Tacuri

2024-05-06

How is Latin America Perceived in Global Diplomacy?

In this presentation, I will explore how Latin America is represented in speeches delivered at the UN General Debate.

My main goals were to understand:

  • How often Latin America is mentioned
  • In what context it’s discussed
  • Who is shaping the narrative

Why This Matters

Understanding how Latin America is talked about at the UN matters for how the region is seen, treated, and engaged with globally.

These speeches shape diplomatic relationships, guide foreign policy, and reflect who gets to define international narratives.

This project matters because representation influences reality.

What I Analyzed

To explore how Latin America is framed in global diplomacy, I worked with a dataset of UN General Debate speeches from 1970 to 2015.

Using a mix of Python and R, I focused on:

  • Tracking how often each Latin American country was mentioned
  • Visualizing regional attention over time
  • Analyzing the tone and content of speeches
  • Understanding what countries talk most about Latin America

Mentions of Latin America in UN Speeches

After cleaning the data and filtering only speeches that mentioned Latin America, I looked at how often each country was referenced.

Some countries, like Cuba and Mexico, are mentioned very frequently and others far less. This gives us a first hint at which nations attract the most international attention.

The following table shows each Latin American country sorted by the number of mentions.

country mentions
Cuba 2023
Panama 1867
Mexico 1635
Nicaragua 1518
Chile 1479
Guatemala 1386
Brazil 1304
Uruguay 1213
Argentina 1206
El Salvador 1103
Bolivia 1095
Ecuador 1089
Venezuela 1034
Honduras 1005
Colombia 995
Peru 963
Paraguay 832
Costa Rica 786
Dominican Rep. 524

This bar chart shows which countries are mentioned the most

What Do These Speeches Talk About?

  • To understand how Latin America is discussed, I looked at the most common words in the speeches
  • This gives an idea of the type of language used when talking about the region at the UN

A Visual Glimpse of Language

  • I made a wordcloud using the most frequent words
  • It shows which terms come up the most when Latin America is mentioned
  • Words like “nations”, “peace”, and “development” stand out
  • Bigger words mean they were used more often in the speeches

What These Words Suggest

  • The bar chart and wordcloud together help show how Latin America is talked about at the UN
  • Words like “peace”, “development”, and “international” suggest a focus on diplomacy and cooperation
  • But words like “security”, “conflict”, and “challenges” point to concerns and problems too

This contrast raised a key question:
What kind of tone do these speeches really have?

That’s what led me to the next part of my project: sentiment analysis.

How Are These Speeches Framed Emotionally?

Are speeches about Latin America framed in a positive, negative, or neutral tone?

  • Used TextBlob, a Python library, to assign basic polarity scores to each speech
  • Chose this method to get a quick overview of tone over time (positive, negative, neutral)

How Has the Tone Changed Over Time?

To see whether speeches about Latin America became more positive, neutral, or negative over time, I used a simple sentiment analysis method called TextBlob.

Each speech receives a score:

  • +1 = very positive
  • 0 = neutral
  • –1 = very negative
  • Shows average tone per year
  • Most scores are around 0.11 = positive tone overall
  • Some spikes and drops suggest reactions to key geopolitical events

Why Sentiment Isn’t enough

  • Looking at the tone gave me a general idea of how Latin America is discussed
  • But tone alone wasn’t enough to really understand the content
  • Two speeches could both have a positive tone, but talk about totally different things
  • That’s why I used topic modeling, a method to find common themes in the texts
  • This helped me understand not just the tone, but the topics linked to Latin America in global discussions

Choosing the Number of Topics

To decide how many topics to use in my LDA model, I tested different values and calculated their semantic coherence.

Coherence peaked at 4 topics.

What Are the Main Topics?

This helped me group the speeches based on common themes.

Each row in the chart shows a different topic, and the words inside each row are the ones most often used in that group of speeches.

Interpreting the Topics

  • After finding the top words in each topic, I wanted to understand what they actually meant
  • I used OpenAI API to help interpret the topics
  • Some were about democracy and peace
  • Others related to the Cold War, human rights, or economic issues

What follows is a closer look at each of the four topics identified.

Cooperation and Conflict in a Global Setting

Below is a short summary of what the first topic seems to be about, based on GPT’s interpretation:

Topic 1 – Summary

This topic likely relates to regional cooperation and challenges.
Words like union and democracy suggest collaboration and governance,
while terms like terrorism, aggression, and climate point to global security and environmental concerns.

The tone is mixed, highlighting both opportunities for cooperation and signs of tension or crisis.

The full interpretation is included in the final report

Geopolitics and Power Struggles

The second topic identified by the LDA model brings up themes related to power, international influence, and Cold War politics.

Topic 2 – Summary

This topic centers on geopolitical tensions and power dynamics.
Terms like terrorism, Soviet, Europe, and powers suggest discussions about security threats, foreign influence, and Cold War legacies.

The tone is serious and complex, with signs of competition and tension between global powers.

The full interpretation is included in the final report

Latin America in a Global Context

The third topic identified in the LDA analysis shifts the lens outward, showing how Latin America is discussed in relation to global events and power structures.

Topic 3 – Summary

This topic frames Latin America within a broader international landscape.
Terms like Israel, Arab, treaty, and Soviet point to global conflicts, diplomatic relations, and external influence.

The tone focuses on international entanglements, showing how Latin America is often seen through the lens of global politics rather than just regional dynamics.

The full interpretation is included in the final report

Governance, Rights, and Global Ties

The final topic centers on how Latin America is framed in relation to governance, human rights, and global influence.

Topic 4 – Summary

This topic reflects speeches that deal with political systems, human rights issues, and international relationships.

Key words like democracy, regime, apartheid, and terrorism suggest a focus on governance and security challenges.

Mentions of Namibia, Europe, and debt point to the global context in which these issues are discussed, emphasizing Latin America’s ties with the international community.

The full interpretation is included in the final report

Having examined the key narratives and sentiments surrounding Latin America in UN speeches, the next logical step is to ask:

Which countries are shaping these narratives?

In the following section, I will explore who talks about Latin America most frequently in the General Debate, and how the level of attention has changed over time.

Which Countries are framing Latin America?

  • I filtered speeches that mention Latin America and looked at who talks about it most
  • Countries like Uruguay, El Salvador, Peru, and Mexico show up the most
  • Some non-Latin American countries also appear, like Laos, Vietnam, Angola, Portugal, and the USA
  • Their presence likely reflects historical, geopolitical, or economic ties
  • The chart shows who’s helping shape the global conversation about Latin America

  • This line chart shows how often Latin America was mentioned each year from the 1970s to 2015
  • Mentions were high during the Cold War, likely due to U.S.–Soviet tensions, revolutions, and debt crises
  • In later decades, mentions declined, possibly as global priorities shifted

What Did I Learn?

Understanding how Latin America is portrayed in UN speeches over time reveals important trends in international politics:

  • During the Cold War (1970s–1980s): Latin America was often framed through ideological tensions, especially between the U.S. and the Soviet Union, with countries like Cuba frequently mentioned.
  • In the 1990s: Mentions slightly dropped as attention shifted to post-Cold War transitions, but themes of democracy and human rights remained central.
  • Post-2000: The tone became more varied with increasing mentions of cooperation, but also of security challenges, development, and crisis.

Across decades, Latin America appears in UN debates both as a regional actor and as a site of global concerns. What surprised me most was how the same region is described so differently depending on who is speaking, when, and why.

Why This Research Matters

Latin America isn’t always at the center of global conversations, but that doesn’t mean it’s ignored.
By looking at how the region is mentioned in UN speeches, this project helps us see what kind of attention Latin America gets in international politics.

This research matters because the way a region is talked about can affect how it is treated.
Speeches like these help shape how countries are seen by others.
They can influence relationships, cooperation, and even global priorities.

Key Takeaway

How countries are described in official speeches can shape how they’re understood and treated on the world stage.

Thank you!

Presented by Wendy Rubi Chavez Tacuri

🌐 Visit my website  |  Presentation  |  Report