2024-05-06
In this presentation, I will explore how Latin America is represented in speeches delivered at the UN General Debate.
My main goals were to understand:
Understanding how Latin America is talked about at the UN matters for how the region is seen, treated, and engaged with globally.
These speeches shape diplomatic relationships, guide foreign policy, and reflect who gets to define international narratives.
This project matters because representation influences reality.
To explore how Latin America is framed in global diplomacy, I worked with a dataset of UN General Debate speeches from 1970 to 2015.
Using a mix of Python and R, I focused on:
After cleaning the data and filtering only speeches that mentioned Latin America, I looked at how often each country was referenced.
Some countries, like Cuba and Mexico, are mentioned very frequently and others far less. This gives us a first hint at which nations attract the most international attention.
The following table shows each Latin American country sorted by the number of mentions.
country | mentions |
---|---|
Cuba | 2023 |
Panama | 1867 |
Mexico | 1635 |
Nicaragua | 1518 |
Chile | 1479 |
Guatemala | 1386 |
Brazil | 1304 |
Uruguay | 1213 |
Argentina | 1206 |
El Salvador | 1103 |
Bolivia | 1095 |
Ecuador | 1089 |
Venezuela | 1034 |
Honduras | 1005 |
Colombia | 995 |
Peru | 963 |
Paraguay | 832 |
Costa Rica | 786 |
Dominican Rep. | 524 |
This bar chart shows which countries are mentioned the most
This contrast raised a key question:
What kind of tone do these speeches really have?
That’s what led me to the next part of my project: sentiment analysis.
Are speeches about Latin America framed in a positive, negative, or neutral tone?
To see whether speeches about Latin America became more positive, neutral, or negative over time, I used a simple sentiment analysis method called TextBlob.
Each speech receives a score:
+1
= very positive
0
= neutral
–1
= very negative
To decide how many topics to use in my LDA model, I tested different values and calculated their semantic coherence.
Coherence peaked at 4 topics.
This helped me group the speeches based on common themes.
Each row in the chart shows a different topic, and the words inside each row are the ones most often used in that group of speeches.
What follows is a closer look at each of the four topics identified.
Below is a short summary of what the first topic seems to be about, based on GPT’s interpretation:
Topic 1 – Summary
This topic likely relates to regional cooperation and challenges.
Words like union and democracy suggest collaboration and governance,
while terms like terrorism, aggression, and climate point to global security and environmental concerns.
The tone is mixed, highlighting both opportunities for cooperation and signs of tension or crisis.
The full interpretation is included in the final report
The second topic identified by the LDA model brings up themes related to power, international influence, and Cold War politics.
Topic 2 – Summary
This topic centers on geopolitical tensions and power dynamics.
Terms like terrorism, Soviet, Europe, and powers suggest discussions about security threats, foreign influence, and Cold War legacies.
The tone is serious and complex, with signs of competition and tension between global powers.
The full interpretation is included in the final report
The third topic identified in the LDA analysis shifts the lens outward, showing how Latin America is discussed in relation to global events and power structures.
Topic 3 – Summary
This topic frames Latin America within a broader international landscape.
Terms like Israel, Arab, treaty, and Soviet point to global conflicts, diplomatic relations, and external influence.
The tone focuses on international entanglements, showing how Latin America is often seen through the lens of global politics rather than just regional dynamics.
The full interpretation is included in the final report
The final topic centers on how Latin America is framed in relation to governance, human rights, and global influence.
Topic 4 – Summary
This topic reflects speeches that deal with political systems, human rights issues, and international relationships.
Key words like democracy, regime, apartheid, and terrorism suggest a focus on governance and security challenges.
Mentions of Namibia, Europe, and debt point to the global context in which these issues are discussed, emphasizing Latin America’s ties with the international community.
The full interpretation is included in the final report
Having examined the key narratives and sentiments surrounding Latin America in UN speeches, the next logical step is to ask:
Which countries are shaping these narratives?
In the following section, I will explore who talks about Latin America most frequently in the General Debate, and how the level of attention has changed over time.
Understanding how Latin America is portrayed in UN speeches over time reveals important trends in international politics:
Across decades, Latin America appears in UN debates both as a regional actor and as a site of global concerns. What surprised me most was how the same region is described so differently depending on who is speaking, when, and why.
Latin America isn’t always at the center of global conversations, but that doesn’t mean it’s ignored.
By looking at how the region is mentioned in UN speeches, this project helps us see what kind of attention Latin America gets in international politics.
This research matters because the way a region is talked about can affect how it is treated.
Speeches like these help shape how countries are seen by others.
They can influence relationships, cooperation, and even global priorities.
Key Takeaway
How countries are described in official speeches can shape how they’re understood and treated on the world stage.
Presented by Wendy Rubi Chavez Tacuri
John Cabot University